IPRoyal vs Webshare: Budget Proxy Plans Compared
IPRoyal vs Webshare compared on price per proxy, bandwidth policy, thread limits and dedicated IPs, plus which budget plan fits your scraping job.

IPRoyal vs Webshare comes down to one question: do you need addresses that are exclusively yours with traffic already bundled in, or do you need the largest number of cheap addresses you can configure? IPRoyal is the first. Webshare is the second. Almost every other difference follows from that.
The entry prices are not comparable line items. Webshare's cheapest datacenter proxy is roughly three cents. IPRoyal's is roughly a dollar forty. That gap is not a discount, and buying on the headline number is how teams end up paying twice. This comparison prices the actual units, names the bandwidth clause that decides most of these purchases, and gives you a test you can run in 90 minutes.
Every vendor figure below was read off iproyal.com and webshare.io as of September 2026. Both reprice and move tier boundaries often, so confirm anything decision-critical on their current pricing page the day you buy.
The 30-second verdict
Buy IPRoyal if you need a small number of stable, exclusive datacenter IPs and you would rather not think about bandwidth. Their datacenter page lists dedicated IPs only, from $1.39 per proxy on the 90-day tier, with 100 GB per proxy per monthly cycle pooled across the order, state and city level targeting, and HTTP(S) plus SOCKS5. For account work, allowlisted access and moderate-volume monitoring, there is little to configure wrong.
Buy Webshare if per-address cost is what you are optimising, you are comfortable tuning three separate plan axes, and you want to validate the idea for free first. Published pricing starts at $0.0299 per proxy at the 100-proxy tier, there is a permanent free tier of 10 proxies with up to 1 GB of monthly bandwidth and no card, and the plan builder exposes bandwidth (250 GB to unlimited) and threads (500 to 3,000) as separately priced sliders alongside proxy count.
Buy neither if your real problem is that the target rate-limits by IP. Both vendors sell you a list of addresses you own, and a list has a ceiling no rotation logic escapes. The per-IP math section shows where it lands.
What each vendor actually sells
IPRoyal
A per-unit marketplace with a broad catalog. As of September 2026 its pricing page lists residential from $1.75/GB against a 64M+ pool, datacenter from $1.39 per proxy across 60+ locations, ISP from $1.80 per proxy against 500K+ unique IPs, mobile from $117/month against a 4.5M+ pool, a Web Unblocker from $1.00 per 1,000 requests, and custom enterprise contracts. Residential traffic is advertised as non-expiring, which matters more than it sounds: unused gigabytes carry forward instead of evaporating monthly.
The datacenter product is deliberately narrow. Every IP is dedicated, and the page advertises unlimited sessions, 10,000+ parallel capacity, and state and city level targeting. Term length is the price lever: $1.57 per proxy on 30 days, $1.48 on 60, $1.39 on 90.
Webshare
A configurator, not a catalog. Three lines as of September 2026: datacenter proxies across 50+ countries, static residential (ISP) from $0.30 per proxy at the 20-proxy tier, and rotating residential billed per gigabyte from $3.50/GB at 1 GB down to $1.40/GB at the 3,000 GB tier, against a network their site puts at 80M+ residential IPs and 195+ locations.
The datacenter line is three distinct products at three prices: shared (used by multiple customers, from $0.0299 per proxy), private (shared with up to two users, from $0.429 per proxy), and dedicated (exclusively yours, from $0.825 per proxy). All three support HTTP(S) and SOCKS5, in static and rotating configurations.
Scraping at scale? Skip the blocks.
Fast, unblockable datacentre proxies with unlimited bandwidth.
Head-to-head table
Every figure below is the vendor's own published claim as of September 2026, not a measurement anyone ran.
| Factor | IPRoyal | Webshare |
|---|---|---|
| **Datacenter shape** | Dedicated IPs only | Shared, private (up to 2 users), or dedicated |
| **Entry datacenter price** | From $1.39/proxy, 90-day tier | From $0.0299/proxy shared, $0.825/proxy dedicated |
| **Term structure** | 30 / 60 / 90 day tiers, price falls with term | Monthly, with yearly discounts advertised up to 50% |
| **Bandwidth model** | 100 GB per proxy per cycle, pooled across the order, more purchasable | Separate priced axis, 250 GB to unlimited |
| **Concurrency** | 10,000+ parallel capacity advertised, unlimited sessions | 500 to 3,000 threads, sold as a plan axis |
| **Datacenter locations** | 60+ | 50+ countries |
| **Geo granularity** | State and city level | Country level on the datacenter tiers |
| **Protocols** | HTTP(S), SOCKS5 | HTTP(S), SOCKS5 |
| **Free tier** | None published | 10 proxies, up to 1 GB/month, no card |
| **Residential** | 64M+ IPs, 195+ countries, from $1.75/GB, traffic never expires | 80M+ IPs, 195+ locations, from $1.40/GB at volume |
| **ISP / static residential** | 500K+ IPs, from $1.80/proxy | From $0.30/proxy at 20 proxies |
| **Mobile** | 4.5M+ IPs, from $117/month | Not sold |
| **Managed unblocking** | Web Unblocker from $1.00 per 1,000 requests | Not sold as a separate product |
Why the entry prices differ by more than 40x
$1.39 against $0.0299 is a 46x gap. Read as a discount it makes IPRoyal look absurd. Read correctly, almost none of it is a discount.
Three things ride inside IPRoyal's number that are absent from Webshare's cheapest one:
- Exclusivity. IPRoyal sells dedicated IPs only. Webshare's $0.0299 line is a shared proxy, used by other customers at the same time. Their own dedicated tier starts at $0.825, and that is the honest comparison: $1.39 against $0.825, a 1.7x gap, not 46x.
- Bundled traffic. IPRoyal's 100 GB per proxy per cycle rides along with the address. On Webshare, bandwidth is a separately priced axis you configure yourself.
- Targeting depth. State and city level selection on a datacenter product is not universal, and it is worth real money for geo-sensitive price or SERP work.
So the number to compare is not price per proxy. It is fully configured monthly cost for the job you actually have. Take a 50-address requirement moving 2 TB a month. On IPRoyal that is roughly $70 of proxies at the 90-day rate, carrying a pooled 5 TB allowance you will not touch. The Webshare dedicated equivalent is roughly $41 of proxies, plus the bandwidth tier that covers 2 TB, plus the thread tier you need. One is a single number, the other is three, and three is cheaper only if you size all three correctly.
Price the term, not the sticker: IPRoyal's per-proxy rate is quoted against a commitment, so the 90-day price is not something you can walk away from after four weeks.
For the mechanics of per-IP versus per-GB billing see understanding datacenter proxy pricing models, and for the exclusivity trade, shared vs dedicated datacenter proxies.
Bandwidth: a slider on one side, a bundle on the other
This is the clause that decides more of these purchases than price does, and neither vendor hides it. People simply do not read it before they buy.
IPRoyal publishes 100 GB of traffic per proxy per monthly cycle on the datacenter product, pooled across the IPs in your order, with more purchasable from the dashboard. Pooling is the important word: ten proxies is a shared 1 TB, not ten separate buckets, so one heavy worker cannot strand allowance on the other nine. Their page sells top-ups rather than describing a cutoff, but confirm the exact overage behavior with support before you size a plan.
Webshare treats bandwidth as a purchased quantity in its own right, published from 250 GB up to unlimited on the datacenter plans, with the free tier capped at 1 GB a month. Their help center documentation describes allowances as set monthly, not rolling over, and states that exceeding the limit stops proxies from functioning.
That last sentence is the operational difference. A hard stop is invisible to the monitoring most teams run:
Error-rate alerting cannot warn you about a bandwidth cliff, because there are no errors until there are only errors.
If you buy a metered plan, alert on consumed bandwidth as a percentage of allowance, not on failure rate. And size the allowance from your own measured payload, not from a request count. Do this before you buy anything:
import requests
TARGET = "https://www.sparkproxy.io/proxies/datacenter/germany/"
total = 0
N = 50
for _ in range(N):
r = requests.get(TARGET, timeout=20)
total += len(r.content)
kb = total / N / 1024
print(f"{kb:.1f} KB per record")
print(f"250 GB allowance = {250 * 1024 * 1024 / kb:,.0f} records")
Run that against your real target, not a homepage. A 250 GB allowance is roughly 1.3 million pages at 200 KB, 670,000 at 400 KB, and about 130,000 if you render pages with images and fonts and land at 2 MB. Almost nobody sizes a plan from a measured payload, which is why bandwidth surprises are the most common budget-proxy complaint. Background on how providers count these bytes: what is bandwidth in proxy services.
The per-IP request math neither vendor escapes
Here is the structural fact comparison articles skip, and it applies to both vendors identically.
Both sell you a list of addresses you own. Whether you rotate through that list randomly, round-robin, or with a cooldown table, the rotation universe is the number of proxies you bought. So:
requests per IP per hour = total requests per hour divided by proxies you own
Work an example. You need 200,000 requests a day, about 8,300 an hour. On a 100-proxy plan from either vendor, that is 83 requests per hour on every single address, roughly one every 43 seconds, forever, from a datacenter ASN. Plenty of targets tolerate that. Plenty issue a 429 well below it, and when they do, your only lever on a list-based plan is buying more addresses. IPRoyal's advertised 10,000+ parallel capacity does not help, because concurrency is not the binding constraint. Neither does Webshare's 3,000-thread tier.
That is where budget proxies stop being the cheap option. Buying identity count to raise a request ceiling scales linearly and never ends. The decision rule is short enough to keep:
If your target punishes IP reuse, buy pool depth. If your target punishes IP churn, buy specific addresses.
Both vendors sell the second thing well. Neither sells the first, and no price comparison between them changes that.
Residential and ISP lines
If your invoice is not really about datacenter proxies, the comparison changes shape.
Residential. IPRoyal publishes 64M+ IPs across 195+ countries from $1.75/GB with country, state and city targeting, rotating and sticky sessions, and traffic that never expires. Webshare publishes 80M+ IPs across 195+ locations, from $3.50/GB at 1 GB falling to $1.40/GB at 3,000 GB. Webshare wins the headline rate at high steady volume; IPRoyal's non-expiring traffic wins for bursty work you buy in bulk and spend over months.
ISP and static residential. Webshare's published $0.30 per proxy at the 20-proxy tier is well under IPRoyal's $1.80, and both sell the same thing: a residential-ASN address that behaves like a datacenter proxy. Unsure you need this category at all? ISP proxies vs residential proxies settles it faster than any vendor page.
Mobile. Only IPRoyal sells it, from $117/month against a 4.5M+ pool. If mobile is on your requirements list, Webshare is out and the rest is academic.
Where IPRoyal is the better buy
- You need exclusive addresses without reading a tier chart to get them. Every datacenter IP is dedicated by default.
- You need city or state level datacenter targeting. Webshare's datacenter tiers are country level.
- You want one number on the invoice. Traffic is bundled and pooled, so there is no bandwidth slider to size.
- You need mobile proxies, or a managed unblocker priced per 1,000 requests, on the same account.
- Your residential usage is lumpy. Non-expiring traffic beats any monthly allowance if you scrape in bursts.
- You run logged-in sessions where a changing IP looks like an account takeover. Rotation hurts here: what is a dedicated datacenter proxy.
Where neither shape fits
Return to the per-IP formula. If the target throttles per address, or your bytes per record are high and unpredictable, a list of owned addresses is the wrong product and the cheaper list is not the answer.
That is the gap SparkProxy is built for, and it is a narrower product than either vendor here. SparkProxy sells concurrent threads against a rotating pool, not addresses: 1M+ datacenter IPs across 80+ countries including 50,000+ US IPs, with unlimited bandwidth on every plan, 30 days validity, and no per-GB metering.
| Plan | Price | Threads | Whitelist slots | Fair-usage speed ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $75/mo | 100 | 5 | 25 Mbps |
| Core | $140/mo | 250 | 10 | 50 Mbps |
| Boost | $240/mo | 500 | 15 | 100 Mbps |
| Plus | $440/mo | 1000 | 25 | 150 Mbps |
Speed figures are ceilings under the fair usage policy, not guaranteed throughput. Larger Pro and Pro+ tiers exist in that policy without public pricing. Three ports, one hostname:
# Rotating pool, a fresh exit IP per request
curl -x http://USER:PASS@gateway.sparkproxy.io:11000 https://ipinfo.io/ip
# Sticky exit, same IP held for the session window
curl -x http://USER:PASS@gateway.sparkproxy.io:11002 https://ipinfo.io/ip
# SOCKS5 for tools that prefer it (TCP only, no UDP relay)
curl -x socks5h://USER:PASS@gateway.sparkproxy.io:13000 https://ipinfo.io/ip
If the blocking is anti-bot rather than rate limiting, no proxy layer is the fix. The SparkProxy Scraping API handles rotation, headless Chromium rendering and stealth behind one call, with 1,000 free credits and no card. Plain fetches cost 1 credit, JS rendering 5, screenshots and PDFs 10, and paid plans start at $49 for 250,000 credits a month with 50 concurrent requests.
curl -G "https://scrape.sparkproxy.io/api/v1" \
-H "X-API-Key: $SPARKPROXY_API_KEY" \
--data-urlencode "url=https://example.com/product/1" \
--data-urlencode "render_js=true" \
--data-urlencode "format=md"
What SparkProxy does not sell, plainly: no dedicated or static datacenter IPs, no residential, ISP or mobile lines, and country-level geo only. If you need any of those, IPRoyal or Webshare is the correct purchase. The category-level trade is covered in residential vs datacenter proxies.
A 90-minute buying test
Do not buy on a comparison table, including this one. Run this instead.
Minutes 0 to 15. Sign up for Webshare's free 10 proxies. No card, no commitment. Point 50 requests at your real target through them and record the status code distribution.
Minutes 15 to 30. Measure bytes per record with the script above and multiply by your monthly record count. That decides whether bandwidth is a real constraint or noise, and it is the input most buyers never collect.
Minutes 30 to 60. Buy the smallest possible IPRoyal datacenter order, a handful of proxies on the 30-day tier, and run the same 50 requests. You are now comparing dedicated against shared on your own target, the only comparison that matters.
Minutes 60 to 90. Push one address hard. Send 300 sequential requests through a single IP and find the rate where 429s or challenges begin. That threshold, divided into your hourly volume, gives the minimum number of addresses you must own. If the number is uncomfortable, you have a pool-depth problem rather than a price problem, and should test a rotating pool before committing to either list.
Record four columns per candidate: success rate, block rate, median latency, bytes per record. Buy the cheapest option that clears your success-rate bar on your own target.
Frequently asked questions
FAQ
Webshare, on published entry pricing as of September 2026: from $0.0299 per proxy for shared IPs against IPRoyal's $1.39. Compare like for like and the gap narrows sharply, because Webshare's dedicated tier starts at $0.825 while every IPRoyal datacenter IP is dedicated and carries 100 GB of pooled traffic.
Yes. Webshare publishes a permanent free tier of 10 proxies with up to 1 GB of monthly bandwidth and no credit card required. It is enough to check whether a datacenter IP works against your target at all, which makes it the cheapest way to start this evaluation.
Their help center documentation describes allowances as set monthly, not rolling over, and states that exceeding the limit stops proxies from functioning. Alert on consumed bandwidth as a percentage of allowance rather than on error rate, because a hard stop produces no warning errors first.
IPRoyal's datacenter page publishes 100 GB of traffic per proxy per monthly cycle, pooled across the IPs in your order, with extra bandwidth purchasable from the dashboard. Ten proxies is therefore a shared 1 TB rather than ten isolated buckets.
Not in the pool sense. Both sell you a fixed list of addresses, and rotation cycles within that list, so your rotation universe equals the number of proxies you bought. Providers that sell concurrent threads against a large shared pool, SparkProxy included, are a structurally different product.
Neither, past a certain volume. Divide your hourly request count by the number of proxies you own: that is the per-IP load a rate limiter sees. When it exceeds your target's threshold, buying more addresses is the only lever a list-based plan offers, and pool depth becomes the cheaper answer.
Get 20% off your first month
Premium datacentre proxies with unlimited bandwidth. Use the code at checkout.
Save up to 15% more on quarterly, half-yearly and yearly plans
Related articles

SparkProxy vs Rayobyte: Flat Plans or Pay per IP
Rayobyte vs SparkProxy on price: what each flat SparkProxy plan buys at Rayobyte's per-IP and per-GB rates, the break-even points, and when each one wins.

SparkProxy vs Webshare: Datacenter Proxy Plans Side by Side
Webshare vs SparkProxy for datacenter proxies: per-proxy lists with bandwidth caps against flat thread plans, with dated prices, rotation math and trial terms.

Hidemium Alternatives: 6 Antidetect Browsers Compared
Hidemium alternatives compared on seats, device limits, billing terms and API access: Hidemyacc, GenLogin, Dolphin Anty, MoreLogin, Kameleo and GoLogin.
