GoLogin vs Incogniton: Which Budget Antidetect Browser

Buy GoLogin if you are one person running a lot of profiles. Its ladder is granular at the bottom and cheap per profile at the top. The published monthly tiers run from $9 for 10 profiles up to $179 for 1,000, with rungs at 25, 50, 100, 300 and 500 profiles in between, and annual billing is advertised at a 50% discount.

Buy Incogniton if two or more people share the work. Its Professional tier at $79.99/mo includes 150 profiles and 3 team member seats, and additional seats are listed at $5 each. GoLogin's plans all show 1 team member, with extra members priced at $10 each per month, so a team of five costs roughly twice as much in seats alone.

Start on Incogniton's free tier either way. It gives 10 profiles for the first two months before dropping to 3, with no card required, which is enough to run a real pilot rather than a demo. GoLogin's free plan is 3 profiles from the start.

Neither of these is a stealth ranking. Fingerprint quality is not something either vendor lets you measure, and nobody publishing a comparison has audited it independently, ourselves included. Price and workflow fit are what you can actually evaluate, so that is what this compares. For the wider field, see our roundup of antidetect browsers for privacy and multi-account management.

The two vendors solved the same packaging problem in opposite directions, and understanding which one you are buying into predicts your bill better than any feature table.

GoLogin prices the capacity. Its tiers are essentially one product sold in different sizes. Every rung is the same browser; what changes is how many profiles you may keep and a handful of throughput limits. The named tiers are Professional, Business, Enterprise and Custom, but the real ladder is the profile count, which steps 10, 25, 50, 100, 300, 500, 1,000, then into thousands. Team members are an add-on that sits outside the ladder entirely.

Incogniton prices the capability. Its tiers differ in what the software will do, not just how much of it you get. The entry tier, Starter Plus, does not include API access, Selenium and Puppeteer integration, the Cookie Collector, profile transfer between users or the Synchronizer. Those all appear at Entrepreneur and above. Team seats appear at Professional and above.

This matters because it changes what a wrong guess costs. Guess low on GoLogin and you buy more profile slots, a linear and predictable upgrade. Guess low on Incogniton and you discover your automation cannot connect at all, because the API is not on your tier. Buyers who plan to script anything should skip Incogniton's cheapest plan on principle rather than on price.

Read on 23 September 2026 from each vendor's own pricing page. GoLogin's page also advertises a 50% annual discount; Incogniton's page advertises a 30% discount on its 6-month term and a larger one on the annual term, and shows three prices per plan.

GoLogin, monthly billing

Extra team members are listed at $10 each per month on top of any tier. The ladder continues past Custom 2k in fixed steps up to 100,000 profiles.

Incogniton, all three terms

Incogniton's custom configurator starts at 500 profiles and 10 seats and scales in 500-profile steps, with extra seats listed at $5 each.

Note the shape difference immediately. GoLogin has eight published rungs before 2,000 profiles. Incogniton has four before 500. Granularity is GoLogin's advantage and it is worth real money if your profile count sits just above one of Incogniton's thresholds.

Divide each published monthly price by the number of profiles you actually need, then pick the cheapest plan on each ladder that holds them. The result lines up differently than the headline prices suggest.

GoLogin is cheaper per profile at six of those seven rungs. The exception is 150 profiles, and it exists because GoLogin's ladder jumps straight from 100 slots to 300. If your count lands between those two numbers you buy 300 slots and use half of them, which pushes the effective rate to $0.66 while Incogniton charges $0.53 for a tier sized exactly for you.

That gap flips again on annual terms, because the two discounts are not the same size. GoLogin's page advertises 50% off for annual billing, which takes Business from $99 to $49.50 a month for 300 profiles. Incogniton's annual rate for Professional is $47.99 a month for 150. You pay roughly the same money and GoLogin hands you twice the slots. Solo operators who can commit for a year should read that row carefully.

This is the single biggest divergence and the one most comparisons skip, because seats are usually a footnote on a pricing page rather than a headline.

GoLogin lists 1 team member on every published tier, from the $9 Professional through to Custom, with extra members at $10 each per month. Incogniton includes 0 seats on Starter Plus and Entrepreneur, 3 on Professional, 10 on its Custom configurator, and prices extra seats at $5.

Work a concrete case. Five people share 150 profiles, billed monthly.

Incogniton: Professional at $79.99 covers 150 profiles and 3 seats. Two more seats at $5 each is $10. Total $89.99/mo.

GoLogin: Professional 100 does not hold 150 profiles, so the fitting tier is Business at $99. It includes 1 member, so four more at $10 each is $40. Total $139/mo.

The difference is $49.01 a month, or $588.12 over a year, and it comes entirely from seat packaging. Nothing about the browsers differs at that point. If your team is larger than three people, run this calculation before anything else, because it dominates every other line item at this size.

Flip the shape and the answer flips too. One person running 500 profiles pays GoLogin $139 and Incogniton $149.99, and neither needs a seat. At 1,000 profiles GoLogin's Enterprise tier is $179, while Incogniton's configurator has stepped beyond its $149.99 starting point. The rule is short: seats favour Incogniton, volume favours GoLogin.

Both pages publish a feature matrix. The parts that change a buying decision are these.

Incogniton's Starter Plus omits automation entirely. No API access, no Selenium or Puppeteer integration, no Cookie Collector, no Synchronizer, no profile transfer between users. It is a manual browsing tier. If you intended to drive profiles from a script, $19.99 buys you something you cannot use for that, and the upgrade to Entrepreneur at $29.99 is mandatory rather than optional.

GoLogin publishes its API rate limit per tier. The plan cards list 300 requests per minute on Professional, 500 on Business, 800 on Enterprise and 1,200 on Custom. That is unusually concrete for this category and it is the kind of number that decides whether a bulk profile-creation job finishes in minutes or hours.

Profile sharing is capped separately from profile count on GoLogin. Professional tiers allow 10 shares regardless of whether you hold 10 or 100 profiles. Business allows 100, Enterprise 1,000. If your workflow hands profiles between people frequently, the share cap binds before the profile cap does.

Cloud launches are capped low on both. GoLogin lists 1 cloud launch on Professional, 2 on Business, 3 on Enterprise. Running profiles in the vendor's cloud rather than on your own machine is a paid extra almost everywhere; if that is your plan, our overview of cloud antidetect browsers covers what that changes.

Both vendors advertise included proxies, and this is where a buying guide written by a proxy operator can be most useful and most suspect at once, so here is the arithmetic rather than an opinion.

Incogniton lists "FREE built-in proxies" on every tier including the free starter. GoLogin includes a residential allowance and sells more in tiers. Its page listed 2 GB included, then add-on tiers at $15.90 for 10 GB, $29.20 for 20 GB, $66.50 for 50 GB and $119 for 100 GB.

Convert those to a per-gigabyte rate:

For comparison, Webshare's own pricing page listed rotating residential starting at $1.40/GB on the same day. So the smallest bundled tier is priced above a standalone vendor's published entry rate, and only the 50 GB and 100 GB tiers beat it. Buying proxy bandwidth inside the browser is a convenience purchase at low volume, not a saving.

The more important point is what bundled proxies are for. They are shared pools you did not choose and cannot audit, which makes them fine for trying the product and wrong for any profile holding an account you care about. Profiles with real logins need an address that is yours alone and stays put, which is a separate purchase from a separate kind of vendor. Our explainer on why antidetect browsers need proxies sets out why the exit IP is the one signal the browser cannot fake, and ISP proxies versus residential proxies covers which static product fits.

Budget accordingly. The browser licence is usually the smaller half of a working setup once the proxy layer is priced honestly.

If profiles are created, launched or driven by code rather than by hand, three things decide the comparison.

Tier eligibility. Incogniton's API lives on Entrepreneur and above. GoLogin exposes its REST API from Professional, its cheapest paid tier at $9.

Rate limits. GoLogin publishes them per tier, from 300 to 1,200 requests per minute. Incogniton's page does not publish a comparable number, so plan to measure it during a trial rather than assume it.

Local driver integration. Both connect to Selenium and Puppeteer style tooling, Incogniton from Entrepreneur upward. The integration is what lets you attach an existing automation stack rather than rewriting it against a vendor SDK.

One practical note that applies to both: if what you need is page content rather than a live logged-in session, driving an antidetect browser is an expensive way to get it. A scraping API renders server-side without a profile slot, a proxy assignment or a machine to run it on. SparkProxy's own charges 1 credit for a plain fetch and 5 for a JS render, with 1,000 free credits and no card:

import requests

r = requests.get(
    "https://scrape.sparkproxy.io/api/v1",
    headers={"X-API-Key": "YOUR_API_KEY"},
    params={
        "url": "https://example.com/listing",
        "render_js": "true",
        "country_code": "GB",
        "premium_proxy": "true",
    },
)
print(r.status_code, r.headers.get("X-Credits-Used"))

Keep the browser profiles for work that genuinely requires a session, and the profile counts in both ladders drop sharply.

If neither ladder fits, the field is wider than these two. Our comparisons of Multilogin against GoLogin and Dolphin Anty against GoLogin cover the next tier up, and the GoLogin alternatives and Incogniton alternatives roundups list the rest.

Both vendors give you enough free access to answer the questions that matter. Spend an afternoon on this instead of reading another comparison.

Create ten profiles and check they are actually distinct. Open the same fingerprint-reporting page from each and compare the reported values. Profiles that differ only in user agent are not profiles, they are tabs.

Attach a real proxy, not the bundled one, and verify the exit. Set the profile's proxy, then confirm the IP, its country and its timezone match what the profile claims. A mismatch between the profile's declared timezone and the exit IP's actual location is a louder signal than the proxy type itself.

Time a bulk operation. Create fifty profiles through the API or the UI and time it. This is where published rate limits become real.

Try the workflow you will actually run. Export a profile, hand it to a colleague, import it, run it. Profile transfer and sharing caps bite in practice far more often than the feature matrix suggests.

Check what breaks when you downgrade. Incogniton's free starter drops from 10 profiles to 3 after two months. Find out what happens to profiles 4 through 10 before you build anything on them.

Fingerprint quality is the one thing this test cannot settle, and it is worth being honest that no published comparison settles it either. What you can settle is whether the tool fits your workflow at a price you can defend, which is usually the decision that was actually in front of you. Our guide to browser fingerprinting covers what these tools are manipulating and why the claims are hard to verify from outside.